this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
114 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3613 readers
125 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
114
After all those dole diaries and ‘mutual obligations’, it turns out Australia’s privatised employment services don’t work | Van Badham (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 11 months ago by vividspecter@lemm.ee to c/australia@aussie.zone
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Privatisation is the result of capitalists looking at everything and asking themselves "how could someone profit from this"? It's not about running services more cost-effectively or making things easier on clients - it's about filtering taxpayer money into private pockets.

Private companies aren't naturally more efficient or less wasteful than government-owned entities - the streams of taxpayer money going to big banks, resource companies and others as subsidies should disabuse anyone of that notion. And arguably a large part of perceived government 'inefficiency' is due to the fact that they contract government projects out to private companies which then keep extracting money via "cost blowouts" and delays.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Privatisation is the result of capitalists looking at everything and asking themselves “how could someone profit from this”?

Most privatized assets are already very profitable - the rich wouldn't be trying to take it if it wasn't valuable. Balance sheet aside, public assets profit society as a whole.

I would say privatisation is the rich asking how fewer people could profit this.

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

This isn't about assets though - it's about government services. Things that aren't designed to be profitable, that naturally will cost money to operate while not generally making money. By privatising these, they are now entities that have to make a profit, and that generally happens by extracting taxpayer money, as well as cutting cost, by reducing staff, service levels, equipment et al. That doesn't make it more efficient - just more painful to use for clients. $9.5bn per year? Someone's laughing all the way to the bank.