this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
141 points (78.5% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You put a lot more trust in our corporate lords and masters than I do.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

there's no trust in my statement. The incentives to increase work hours already exist, and even if it's not snake oil, this tech won't change that. A work hour is a work hour regardless if the worker is sitting down or in a lucid dream.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

In the US not long ago, families were thriving on a single income. And then some families sent two parents to work and saw large relative benefits. As more families did this, the relative benefit lowered. Employers found they could pay people less and the family would make up the gap with two incomes. Today, many families struggle with two incomes.

This is a technology that is again, a potential way to double your income if you can work while you sleep and awake. The people who use it will see a relative benefit. Until it becomes necessary for everyone to work while sleeping.

So if it holds true that they just count as work hours, most people will eventually be required to double their workload to afford their necessities.