this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
90 points (100.0% liked)

196

16509 readers
2343 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rule

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neato@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How does #4 interact with laws on hate speech, harassment, etc?

[–] pory@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I'd argue that fighting and punishing hate speech would be protected by Tenet II, which takes priority over "other laws".

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Eh, the phrasing is a bit on the libertarian side for my liking (are we still doing phrasing?), but I like the sentiment. I take the "social contact" view of the Paradox of Tolerance, so speech and rhetoric that deprives others of their rights should not be protected, IMHO.

Plus, this is designed more as a personal code of ethics rather than system of government, so I'm not really too worried about "enforcing" any of these. And since I personally don't see a conflict when it comes to limiting the speech of others if it is inciting violence or encouraging discrimination, I think it's ok the way it's written.

But hey, to thine own ~~stuff~~ self be true. Write your own version if you like and share it around.