this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1401 readers
134 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
127
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
 

Anatoly Karlin @powerfultakes

Replying to @RichardHanania

I'm against legalizing bestiality because the animal consent problem hasn't been solved, but probably actually will be quite soon thanks to Al (at least for the higher animals with complex languages). So why not wait a few more years. I don't see disgust as a good reason. It was an evolutionary adaptation of the agricultural era against the spread of zoonotic illnesses, but technology will soon make that entirely irrelevant as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 43 points 11 months ago (2 children)

i like how he sees the "consent problem" as just a communication thing. "if they could speak, they would be saying yes"

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

perhaps he’s not hoping for “animals able to enthusiastically consent” but is in fact hoping for “animals amenable to participating in the free market and the world’s oldest profession”

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"I don't see disgust as a good reason" shows he hasn't considered reasons why a chihuahua would dissent

[–] locallynonlinear@awful.systems 9 points 11 months ago

Looking forward to when the grizzly bear grunts in his direction and he has to decide which reaction is the clear non consent one.

[–] outer_spec@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

To be fair, the animals might be reverse furries.