this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
322 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2709 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Americans are increasingly unlikely to believe that those who work hard will get ahead and that their children will be better off than they are, according to two recent polls.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It was never alive in the first place, it's just a mean of giving some glimmer of false hope while the oligarchs continue being parasites.

[–] Ilikecheese@lemm.ee 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I disagree, back in the 60s it was totally possible to find a decent paying job, have a couple of kids, buy a house to store them in, get a new car every few years, send your kids off to school, go on vacations and retire at an age old enough to enjoy some time with the grandkids. Now that really isn’t a reality for the average person.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

When my dad bought a house in LA during the 70s, his car cost more than the house.

However, the car died after 2 years which apparently was normal. He then drove a 1977 Ford Ranger up north and that thing would barely start, ever.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was, briefly, in postwar America.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you were of the fair-skinned persuasion, maybe...

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

You’re right, but important to remember that 90% of America was white in 1960.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You don't think any American generation did better than the previous one through work?

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Some generations did better than previous ones due to economic conditions at the time, and this is especially true in the period between WWII and Reaganomics. Some individuals experience both hard work and success, but there are a great many hard working individuals who have no personal wealth to speak of.

As for working hard, (unless I miss your point) - it's hardly new for older generations to accuse younger ones of not wanting to work.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why qualify this with "through work?"

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because that’s part of “the American dream”?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

American Dream, ideal that the United States is a land of opportunity that allows the possibility of upward mobility, freedom, and equality for people of all classes who work hard and have the will to succeed.

How would one “work hard” without working?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Naw after WWII when half the men were dead, everyone had jobs, houses, and two women fawning over them. It was great, if only we had a way to kill off half the people so everyone could have twice as much.