this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
128 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
282 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A subsidy-fueled boom helped build China into an electric-car giant but left weed-infested lots across the nation brimming with unwanted battery-powered vehicles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand why they wouldn't introduce a trade scheme for petrol car owners: swap your petrol pollution machine for a free EV!

Also, why not sell these cars to be retrofitted with better batteries? Wouldn't it be cheaper that building a whole new car? How is there no industry around this?

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 3 points 11 months ago

A guess is that those cars are so bad that nobody wants them even for free.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Becuse that requires the government own them, which requires that they finish working their way though bankruptcy court. Some already have, and the rest should follow sooner or later.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why would the government have to own them? Plus, it's China. The government can persuade pretty much any national company to do their bidding. Sometimes they even persuade foreign companies to do their bidding *cough* Google Apple *cough*

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it’s kind of hard to eminent domain the subject of an ongoing legal battle?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Really? The "communist" government that builds highways around the homes of people who don't want to move, disappears business owners who don't fall in line with the party mandate, and forces private companies to spy in their interest will find it "kind of hard" to nationalize resources of a private company?

I'd like to remind you that China isn't Europe or the US.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

You will note that none of thouse things might involve repossessing things party members might own a stake in the same way that they would a failed company.