Open Source

31272 readers

451 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml

252

Libre Arts - GIMP 3.0 finally has a release schedule (librearts.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Matth78@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Their goal is to release for may 24.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't uses gimp since the time of Ubuntu CDs

[–] Matth78@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I admit for the very limited things I do and only occasionally I use Paint.net

Still in my mind Gimp is much more powerful?

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is powerful, but usability is as shit as it always has been. Except for specific use cases Krita is the way to go nowadays. Even if it's focussed on digital painting, it has almost everything you need for digital editing as well, with a much more user friendly UX.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think the main problem with GIMP is that it was made by developers with developers in mind, completely ignoring how digital artists work. Like it or not, everybody has to take pages from Photoshop (and co.) like how Affinity and Krita are doing, otherwise there's really no incentive to completely change your workflow.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So much. Yes. How do we all agree on this and yet it hasn't sunk in after twenty five years?

I mean, Blender got it. Be like Blender.

Gimp never even needed to be as robust as Photoshop. All anybody needs is a OSS alternative to casually touch up a photo every now and then if you aren't forced by life to be one of Adobe's hostages. Just give me a vaguely Photoshop-like thing with a semi-competent context aware filter that isn't physically painful to use. Kryta and others will pick up the slack for all the painting stuff.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

As a developer I still find it an extremely frustrating and unintuitive experience.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah the GUI is horrible with Gimp but it is very powerful software. I'm used to it's idiosyncrasities but it really needs a GUI refresh. It's powerful software held back from it's full potential.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I admit for the very limited things I do and only occasionally I use Paint.net

Unfortunately, it's not available on Linux

Still in my mind Gimp is much more powerful?

Yes it is, but it's also much more complicated. I never fully understood GIMP, I prefer simpler options like Paint.net.

[–] chicagohuman@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I use it a fair amount. But I think the name is still an issue for some people. They should change it to GLIMPSE. GNU Libre Image Manipulation Program SoftwarE ... or something