this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
787 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LexiconDexicon@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Why doesn't AOC run? I'd vote for her. I've been impressed with her job so far

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Run in the primary the party isn't allowing?

She can't run in something that doesn't exist.

Run 3rd party in the general?

Progressives tend to care enough about America they won't hand the election to trump

[–] Zaktor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If someone big declared (AOC included), the party would have to run a primary, because arbitrarily shutting them out would be more damaging than debates and internal dissent, but all the big names know they couldn't win a primary and would only hurt Biden in the general so they're falling in behind him. As long as it's joke challengers like RFK Jr. and Marianne Williamson though, they can scrap it without worry.

[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AOC is 33 years old. You have to be at least 35 years old to run for president.

[–] Zaktor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

She'll be old enough by the time she'd be sworn in, which is the actual age requirement.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

2028 would be the earliest that she would be viable on one condition. If millenials and Gen Z voted Democratic nearly 100%. Ideally, this should happen because that would mean 2-3 red states and every other state is blue. So, we're going to have to wait for 2032 at the earliest or 2036 for AOC to have her time to shine. I'd gladly vote for her.

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they know she can't win right now. No real progressive can yet. They need to build up her record more and let more of the old neo-libs die off first.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bullshit. It's because they don't want a real progressive to win. They did everything they could to keep Bernie from winning when he ran. The left wing of our government is further right than the right was 50 years ago, and the DNC will do whatever they have to do to keep it that way.

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kinda feels like you're angrily agreeing with me while using different words while acting like you're arguing against me.

This isn't reddit, not every comment section has to be A vs B arguments.

[–] Backspacecentury@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't she too young still? I was under the impression you had to be 35 to run for president.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

She isn't old enough.