Programmer Humor

32495 readers

664 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

798

I hate API like this (i.imgur.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by callmepk@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is Microsoft.
He returns Webhook success with a code 200 and plaintext 1.
He returns Webhook failure with a code 200 and a string tells its endpoint returned error 400.
the string didn't tell what exactly the error.
Don’t be like Microsoft.

EDIT: Got a few details wrong since this happens a few months ago and this meme used to be on r/ProgrammerHumor. Also the proof:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their azure documentation is mostly surface level. They make all those docs like they're talking to a user not a dev. They're limited AF when you're actually trying to deploy an app via a ci/cd pipeline

Microsoft365 docks have several articles that are fully depreciated and there is no disclaimer at the top about switching to new security standards or anything like that.

That's just off the top of my head, but there have been plenty more I've had the displeasure of using

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Their azure documentation is mostly surface level. They make all those docs like they’re talking to a user not a dev. They’re limited AF when you’re actually trying to deploy an app via a ci/cd pipeline

Deploy to what? I've had no issues deploying to App Service from both Github actions and Azure pipelines and azure functions / static web apps were even easier.