this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1742 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32503 readers
506 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sort of. Nobody's cutting corners on aviation structural components, for example. We've been pretty good at maximizing general value output, and usually that means lower quality, but not always.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going to say that's the exception that proves the rule, assuming they were structural parts and not a minor controller chip for de-icing or something.

The company themself announced it without being prompted, and if whoever introduce these unapproved parts into a small number of engines is caught there's going to be real hell to pay. The stuff that stops you from falling out of the sky is serious business, and is largely treated as such.

On the other hand, a software function that's hacked together and inefficient will just fly below the radar, and most people will prefer two cheap outfits to one that's actually well made for the same price, so quality goes right out the window.