this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
16 points (83.3% liked)

Games

16742 readers
700 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Seriously, why pay $60 for a skin? This is like nft's for video games

EDIT: After playing the video posted on Twitter. I can safely say that this is a "Look at me. I'm a dumbass who spent $60 for a skin! EVERYONE LOOK AT ME!"

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

That's COD skins in a nutshell. Either that or the skin is broken and it's pay to win. If you watch any ranked play from the last game, 90% of people had the Groot skin.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

In a way it's even worse. NFT's gave people the illusion that it's an investment. This is just basically a dunce hat