this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
35 points (81.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
354 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People who are uninformed don't know they're uninformed, and until you're given such information that shows you don't have all the facts, why would you assume you don't have a good grasp?

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wtf, are you being serious right now? Why do you assume you do?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Listen, I don't want to resort to the type of condescending interaction that is so common on the internet - perhaps you don't realize the implications of what you wrote, or even what you wrote. If, however, you are sincerely arguing for some fucked up form of expertise by default, please let me know and I'll be happy to oblige.

Oh. I guess I might've done it anyway.

[–] ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're literally quoting Wikipedia as if it's an authority when it doesn't even qualify as a secondary source.

I'm not trying to undermine Wikipedias place on the internet, but they are far from an authority on any of the subject matter posted on the site.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

So I picked a source I found concise. That's not a crime or proof that the information within is wrong.