this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
351 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32321 readers
790 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I first read the titile, I thought that the US is going to have to build A LOT to triple global production. Then it occured to me that the author means the US is pledging to make deals and agreements which enable other countries to build their own. Sometimes I think the US thinks too much of itself and that's also very much part of American branding.

Where are my renewable bros at? Tell me this is bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly do you mean by "in the meantime"? What kind of timeline do you envisage for the large scale rollout of nuclear energy? Do you seriously think it'll be possible to roll out nukes faster than building some more storage?

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is "some more storage" can't be done, the technology doesn't exist

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dams and railroads have existed for hundreds of years.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

FYI, the railroad thing is bullshit much like towers lifting cement blocks up and down. Dams are great, but they are extremely dependent on location and most of the earth is unsuitable for them.