this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
156 points (95.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40183 readers
646 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A few months ago I went on a quest for a DNS server and was dissatisfied with current maintained projects. They were either good at adblocking (Blocky, grimd...) or good at specifying custom DNS (CoreDNS...).

So I forked grimd and embarked on rewriting a good chunk of it for it to address my needs - the result is leng.

  • it is fast
  • it is small
  • it is easy
  • you can specify blocklists and it will fetch them for you
  • you can specify custom DNS records with proper zone file syntax (SRV records, etc)
  • it supports DNS-over-HTTPS so you can stay private
  • it is well-documented
  • can be deployed on systemd, docker, or Nix

I have been running it as my nameserver in a Nomad cluster since! I plan to keep maintaining and improving it, so feel free to give it a try if it also fulfils your needs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nico@r.dcotta.eu 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Including SRV records? I found that some servers (blocky as well) only support very basic CNAME or A records, without being able to specify parameters like TTL, etc.

I also appreciate being able to define this in a file rather than a web UI

[–] AndyM@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's based on dnsmasq. You could always specify custom records, even before there was an option in the web interface. Just create a config file in /etc/dnsmasq.d

Just look up these options: host-record cname srv-host

[–] nico@r.dcotta.eu 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks! I didn't know you could do that. I'll see how it compares to my current solution

[–] Eideen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I do it via dnsmasq, that Pi uses.

I have a ansible playbook, that i use to sync my Piholes.

[–] Stubborn9867@lemmy.jnks.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

You can do the basic records via file. /etc/pihole/custom.list is a hosts formatted file for records so you don't have to use a gui.