this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
1479 points (96.1% liked)

tumblr

3418 readers
574 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.

Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
1479
Can IT confirm? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/tumblr@lemmy.world
407 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bear theory.

My house doesn't need to be impenetrable, it just needs to be more of a hassle to get into than yours.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not even that. It just needs to look like more of a hassle.

They really just let anyone buy those signs that say you have security cameras or an angry dog.

[–] variants_of_concern@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Someone mentioned to me that those angry dog signs are a liability because if someone gets bit they can say you knew you had angry dog, so it's best just to have a sign that says dog and doesn't mention it's mood

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"Dog with sharp teeth"

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Might dependsl on your jurisdiction. But I wouldn't be worried they'd probably need to prove you had a duty of care to them which you acted outside of which resulted in injuries that could have been avoided by you acting with a reasonable level of care.

Also if you did have a duty of care to them and knowingly had a dangerous dog not warning someone of known dangers (the dog) might constitute a break of your duty of care.

Tldr: It depends, you get what you pay for get your advice from actual local lawyers not random people on the street or the internet (like me).