this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
205 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13509 readers
1452 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personally, I would've just changed the name to something that wasn't used by the Nazis if I was in charge of West Germany after the war 🤔

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a German, I don't see the point of this. Luftwaffe literally means air weapon. This is like saying there shouldn't be a US army because 'army' is the name the confederation used for it's forces. It's not like Germany has a Schutzstaffel any more.

I would much rather have had denazification, but of course neither happened so...yay?

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

You could use a synonym like Luftstreitkräfte (or Luftstreitkraft, German Wikipedia seems to use both singular and plural and it's clear to me which one is correct) like the other comment suggests. To me, it just seems weird to still use the same terms as the Nazis, but it makes sense considering the whole ”no denazification” thing, I guess.

there shouldn't be a US army

I agree.

anakin-padme-2 You just mean the word army, right?

anakin-padme-3

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I-was-saying there shouldn't be a US army

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

In GDR it was Luftstreitkräfte, for example.