I see a lot of people saying they'd love to have that type of content here when Meta federates, and that those will be the best instances because they will have the most content, but they will still be accessible without compromising their privacy.

I truly don't get this.

I'm not here for mass-produced content, if I wanted that, I'd be in other platforms. The beauty of these communities is they are not filled with posts that are all the same, algorithms and bots. It's just a community of real people having conversations.

If you want mass-produced trendy content, please, consume it elsewhere, and when you are inevitably fed up, then come here and enjoy the slow-paced, real community.

PD: I hope this doesn't come across as wall-keeping (or however it's said lol), It's my honest opinion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] SamXavia@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel META getting into the Fediverse platform is a great idea, brings it to the masses more easily. We just need to make sure META doesn't take control of it as everyone should be able to use the platform they wish to use.

[–] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like "great idea" and META don't really belong in the same sentence

[–] SamXavia@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Better than "great idea" and Elon Musk tbh

[–] patsharpesmullet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. Musk is a man child that is quickly becoming exposed as not the genius.

Meta on the other hand is a large multinational that has had its hand in manipulating governments, mental health and personal image issues, conspiracy theories and genocide.

I couldn't give a shit if Elon attempted to move here because he'd make a balls of it. Meta should be resisted at every opportunity.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Recall that one of the first things Elon did with Twitter was to unban fascists who had been banned for harassment & calls for violence. That's not "childish" — that's malicious collaboration with criminals & oppressors.

[–] patsharpesmullet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A fair point and while I'd prefer he stayed away I still think meta is a much more dangerous entity to allow get a foothold.

[–] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nah dumbass billionaires are dumbass billionaires. At least Elon is doing the work for us of taking the piss out of his reputation.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a slippery slope down the path of corporate enshitification. I say we shouldn't let them in and others like them to start.

[–] Aicse@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a common practice for most of big companies. Infiltrate, take control and destroy.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's been an often employed corporate tactic, embrace a technology and make it popular, extend it so outside interests can't employ it, then squeeze all the profit they can which inevitably kills it.

[–] SamXavia@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then the platform will probably not get far as most people aren't looking for 'alternative' platforms instead want to use what is popular, If a main stream company uses the systems then it means the mass of people will be able to access it and therefor hopefully make people more aware that you don't have to use the ones from META and any other company that want to get into but if the company truly has the users intrests at heart you'd hope they'd make the platform fair and hopefully with less data collection.

[–] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Then the platform will probably not get far...

Honestly, it doesn't need to. "Getting far" right now means polluting the platform with mass-produced junk content instead of genuine discussions and interactions.

The platform and its current rate of organic growth is perfect as it is.