Technology

59377 readers

4098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

244

Bitwarden passkey support starts rolling out through the browser extension (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/technology@lemmy.world

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're talking about vaultwarden, that's an unofficial project, so will take him time to map the client and add that in.

If you're talking about the the regular paid Bitwarden server binaries, of course it will have support.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there is an official self hosted bitwarden server. It doesn't support SSO, I guess time will tell if it supports this.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's bare minimum, not even 2FA is working without a premium account.

I was shocked how much more Vaultwarden is providing for free.

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean Bitwarden wants to make money. 10$ a year to not have to mess about with self hosting (however beneficial that might be) is a pretty good deal.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself. Centralized password safes aren't my favorite thing.

I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it's weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The official self-hosted Bitwarden server does support SSO.