this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
378 points (90.4% liked)

World News

39402 readers
2452 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's straight Machiavelli politics.

I highly recommend you read, or listen to, The Prince by Machiavelli. It's a very short read, but helps you get in the right frame of mind for this type of politicking

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I know Machiavelli, I don't remember suicidal tactics, though, and certainly not playing according to ones worst enemies playbook.

But mass media wasn't around in the Renaissance..

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole philosophy is how to get the outcomes you want, any means are justified.

Saying person X is playing into person Ys playbook is making huge assumptions about their goals.

We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

And I thank you for that exposition, however cynical it does give some reason to what appears madness.

But if it comes to serving the people of Palestine they aren't really doing that, rather the opposite.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hamas is not working in the best interest of Palestine civilians, they are working in the best interest of Hamas - Which is a fascist theocratic military organization with goals of ethnic cleansing.

The only issue at question is why did the Gazan people feel that Hamas was their best option in 2006 when they were elected into office? I don't really know, I can speculate that the hopeless turn to extreme religious war mongers for even the promise of a better future, or failing that the promise of a fight as they are erased from history.... some people, when they have no hope, will hold on to revenge.

Since 2006, and the failed coup in 2007, Hamas hasn't held any elections and runs as a dictatorship.