this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
235 points (98.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
404 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pentagon officials have been frustrated for months over an Alabama senator’s blockade of more than 300 senior military nominations. But after the Marine Corps chief was hospitalized over the weekend, that frustration is turning into rage.

Gen. Eric Smith had been filling both the No. 1 and No. 2 Marine Corps posts from July until he was finally confirmed as commandant in September. He, along with more than 300 other senior officers, was swept up in the promotions blockade put in place by GOP Sen. Tommy Tuberville in protest of the Pentagon’s abortion travel policy.

In an interview Wednesday, Tuberville brushed off the comments from the DOD officials.

“They’re looking for someone to blame it on, other than themselves,” he said. “We could have all these people confirmed if they’d have just gone by the Constitution.

“I don’t listen to these people,” he added. “They’re just looking for any possible way to get themselves out of a jam.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Senate can bypass Tuberville’s hold by voting on officers individually, which it has done in only three instances, but to do so now for every frozen nomination would take months and impede action on numerous other issues.

Tough shit. Get to work. You shouldn't have let a small problem turn into a big problem. If the solution is going to take a long time, then there's no time to waste. Don't let it happen again.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, they should do nothing more than approve these nominations as tubbyville wants instead of doing THEIR ACTUAL JOBS legislating.

Man, this take is dumb as a box of bricks.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

What legislating? With the House in the other Party's control the Senate isn't going to be doing much other than voting against bullshit.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everything about how the US government functions is based entirely on the idea that everyone acts in good faith. There is no real mechanism for dealing with those who abuse the system. Sadly, over 250 years, nobody has tried to fix this. Our system is broken but working just as designed.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

There are actually plenty of ways the majority party of both houses of congress can deal with "bad faith" actors. For one, the majority party could just say that the minority party doesn't get to vote on anything, or conduct any congressional business at all. Straight up denying the minority party any influence whatsoever. This would be 100% constitutional and since both houses of congress define their own rules for how they run themselves, any collection of people that have 50+1 votes is free to do this.

However you are correct that the system is working as designed. Capitalism doesn't care if you vote red or blue, as long as they get to choose the candidates and that's why things like this that have obvious legal answers somehow can't ever get done. Yet billions for the defense industry, or the oil industry can be passed with hardly a debate.

[–] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything about how the US government functions is based entirely on the idea that everyone acts in good faith.

No. Duties and authority are divided up between the three branches of government to prevent an individual acting in bad fath from bringing everything down.

There is no real mechanism for dealing with those who abuse the system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL you apparently haven't paid attention to the last 30 years or so.

[–] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago

When Bill Clinton got elected?