this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
705 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3806 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you support sustainability, social responsibility, tech ethics, or trust and safety? Congratulations, you’re an enemy of progress. That’s according to the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The Capitalists sure did make an enemy out of anything remotely communist. I think it’s been several years in a row now Nordic countries have been rated the happiest in the world. They don’t practice traditional capitalism either (heavily regulated capitalism with a strong social safety net), one could argue they’re on to something

[–] MrHandyMan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

What the hell are you talking about. The nordic countries constantly rate as one of the most economically free countries in the world. Capitalism is everywhere in the nordic countries, but it's also used to support comprehensive welfare state.

And yes, I come from the "happiest country in the world" so I guess I can literally see that we are quite capitalistic.

Edit: it seems that the original comment was edited so my comment looks kinda unnecessary now

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When the Capitalists enslave your country and remove your safety nets and healthcare, tell them youre a capitalist lol

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are these Capitalists in the room right now?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

They're in my government right now.

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nope, they’re gangbangin your mom

[–] MrHandyMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who are these special "capitalists" you are referring to? Majority of Finnish citizens and literally every major political party here?

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Billionaires. They’re already coming for NHS, you think you’re not next?

[–] MrHandyMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No lol. Also the Finnish health care system is already heavily a mix of public and private sectors because of how our social security system and occupational health care system works.

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Billionaire, a creature who seeks power rather than money, would never come for you, would they

[–] MrHandyMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If we are talking about power hungry people, I'm much more concerned about the authoritarian power hungry leader right next to my country currently at war with another european country than some hypothetical power hungry billionaire who could try to harm our society.

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, as I said, Billionaires are the source of most of the world problems.

[–] MrHandyMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess by that logic the socialista are also the problem because last time they were the ones who invaded us.

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I’m not familiar with your history so I have no opinion to add to your statement

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Socialism isn't necessarily about taking away economic freedom, there are versions of market socialism that may be considered economically free. Socialism is ,theoretically , the transition state between capitalism and communism, so capitalists might still exist in a socialist state, but not a communist state where they are completely abolished. Socialism therefore is about disempowering capitalists and empowering workers until one day the workers hold all the power and cast off the capitalist. This can be done in many ways from a revolution to sieze the means of production to a progressive tax that takes away capitalist wealth.

Most modern socialists in the west realize without a large scale crisis the likes of the great depression, the people won't support a revolution. The best they can do is to disempower the capitalists with tactics allowed in the current system. These tactics, trade unionism, welfare states, progressive taxes, nationalization of industries are all in heavy use in the Nordic countries, and imo contribute significantly to their happiness.

Socialism is measured by the power of the workers, not the control of the market.

[–] MrHandyMan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, I don't disagree with anything you said. The original comment before OP edited it said that the nordic countries don't have capitalism which was something I found highly misinformative.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've had so many debates with people who say "socialism is a success, it works in Scandinavia".

And I'm like, when have the Scandinavian and Nordic countries ever been socialist?

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nordic countries are socialist, unless you have a very narrow view of socialism in that it's basically a synonym for communism. Socialism is the transition state between capitalism and communism, and therefore exists on a large spectrum. On one end of the spectrum is pure capitalism where capitalists have complete control and autonomy over production, and on the other end is pure communism where workers have complete control over production. Socialism stands ambiguously on the communist end of the spectrum, but theirs a large gray area. Government policies and institutions like progressive taxes, trade unions, welfare states, regulations and nationalized industries serve to empower workers and move the system towards the communist side of the spectrum into the socialist territory.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, they're social democratic, which is not the same as socialist.

[–] allstar@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

TIL Nordic countries are not capitalist :o

[–] cia@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Those countries are capitalist. Research the Nordic Model.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think it’s been several years in a row now Nordic countries have been rated the happiest in the world.

Those studies tend to be heavily Euro-centric.

Some of the happiest countries on earth are in East Asia. Bhutan, in particular, is the happiest country you've never heard about. Vietnam and Singapore also tend to rate very high. Bolivia also tends to punch well above its weight class.

But it should be noted that the Nordic states have historically been very far removed from war. With the Ukraine/Russia conflict, Fins are significantly more unhappy than they've been in prior generations. I don't think you can blame that on their domestic policy or their economic model. As more refugees are forced through Europe in an effort to flee conflicts in Armenia and police crackdowns in Hungary and industrial sabotage through the Baltic Sea, happiness in the region is plummeting.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The fact the Nordic countries are rated as the most happy in the world proves that abolishing capitalism is a fucking awful idea. The Nordic countries are all capitalist.

I think most of the happiness comes from the strong unions and long history of worker’s rights movements. Sweden don’t have a law that determines minimum wage for example. It is the unions that determine a fair wage.