this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
909 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zerkrazus@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if FB/Meta tried to just settle out of court and pay them off.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

"That'll be one billion quid, please."

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They will. This was most likely planned by their legal team in advance, will cost Facebook a negligible amount compared to their revenue and marked as a “risk.” And when they settle it will be a planned business expense, like a fine

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would it have cost Facebook to come up with a different name?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

~$1,000,000,000,000 USD, which is why they're trying to do it the "easy way"

[–] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The legal fees alone while it gets dragged out in court will definitely hurt the smaller company.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the strategy, of course. Throw a ton of lawyers at it and hope the other company just gives up.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah they don’t even need to hire a law firm. They pay millions of dollars in retainer every year to keep lawyers on staff, so this is just someone’s day job to go through the motions

[–] paprika@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

The article says Meta already tried to buy them out four times. So this company is waiting for a bigger payout or they don't plan to sell. With a court decision on their side they will have much more leverage to force Meta's hand.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

The company has said that they've spent a decade building their "brand" under that name. So, if they're pushing for a big payout, they intend it to be gargantuan rather than the usual payoff. Changing their name would essentially be starting over in some ways. And the confusion they claim as their reason for action is a legit thing.

I'm not saying that isn't their goal behind the scenes, but FB tried to buy the name and failed, so I have a feeling they aren't looking for the usual quiet payoff that's the goal of that type of action.