this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1089 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3769 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta given 30 days to cease using the name Threads by company that trademarked it 11 years ago::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t know about UK trademark law, but I would imagine that, like with other countries, using a similar or identical name is okay, but only if you’re in a totally different industry. The original threads is also a messaging product, which doesn’t bode well for a lawsuit.

I imagine they thought they could just force a smaller company’s hand. Meta’s marketing, e-staff, and legal team are a bunch of corporate bullies.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads is a cloud-based intelligent message hub that captures, transcribes, and organizes all of a company's digital messages, emails, and phone calls into one easily searchable database.

B2B is a completely different marketplace than B2C, and “internal search index of company’s digital messages” is a different industry than “social media app.”

The company’s own trademark registration indicates the trademark applies to “computer software, software and apparatus for the extraction of business information and knowledge.” That doesn’t sound like a social media app to me, either.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Both Threads are designed to strip-mine data from messages.

Zuck's is just pretending it's about something else.

[–] SuperJetShoes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If it's all in writing you can't just force another company to do what you want. What you can do is wriggle, twist and delay until it becomes too expensive for the smaller company to continue to pursue.

However judges are more than well aware of this technique and will allow the plaintiff to accrue costs against Legal Aid (paid for by government).

So what usually happens:

  1. Small co files against large co for using same name
  2. Large co produces huge response document which is all piss and wind
  3. Small co says they can't afford the costs to answer each point
  4. Judge permits Small Co to use Legal Aid.
  5. Large co offers to settle. (E.g. you're a 3 person sandwich shop. They offer you £10m. No more work, no more hassle)

If Small Co is energetic, young and courageous, they may choose to fight to the death. But Legal Aid has a limit...