this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
1819 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35493 readers
949 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well i am certainly not using reddit on my tablet anymore.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What is that app possibly made of that it cant run on literally anything? It's just an app for text and images. I dont get it, is it optimized like an actual potato?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is it optimized like an actual potato?

Back when it was still in beta, it went through a period where it drained my battery from 100% to dead in under 30 minutes.

Just by being installed, not even actually using it.

[–] sweBers@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Facebook still does this to me. I log in via Web app now.

[–] madis@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could be a library or feature that the devs didn't consider worth maintaining on older devices.

For context, the OP appears to be using Android 5 or 5.1, released in 2014/2015 respectively and is used on 1.1-1.3% devices worldwide.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What a stupid anti-human shit, I hate it. All my devices from 10 years ago are still perfectly fine and operational, and I can't use them because of some people's laziness. They are used on 1% devices not because they are necessarily bad or broken but because it's impossible to use them now for arbitrary reasons.

[–] CrabLangEnjoyer@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This really has nothing to do with being lazy, a lot of modern software just straight up isn't supported anymore on such old systems. Making it compatible and testing it on those old platforms makes no business sense at all. Far too expensive with little to no benefit overall.

If anyone is to blame here it's the phone manufacturers that don't provide updates to those devices.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. Rag on Reddit all you want, but a company maintaining compatibility with an almost 10 year old OS version is a bit much.

[–] SirShanova@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Windows 8.1 Release: October 17, 2013 Windows 8 EoL: January 10, 2023

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly, they EOL it after 10 years. And that's MICROSOFT. Reddit is smaller by many orders of magnitude.

If anything, backward compatibility is Google's fault.

[–] static_motion@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Bingo. For a lot of devices, especially anything made after 2015-ish, there's no real reason why mid to high-end devices couldn't be running the most recent OS version outside of "it's a lot of work to certify updates for so many devices". Thankfully Android has a custom ROM scene which keeps devices going for a few years longer.

[–] pizza_pineapple@vlemmy.net 17 points 1 year ago

I've never seen such an aggressive take on maintaining backwards compatibility haha

[–] madis@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, true. But it is more reasonable to hate the manufacturer who refused to update, not the app devs who would have to do more work for small gain. Or unofficially update your own device, if possible.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not hating on the developers, I'm hating on the whole situation

[–] Ishigami@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mobile devices have become like 20x more powerful in the last 10 years lol. Found my Dad's old Galaxy S3 while cleaning the house, and it was still in working condition. Just soo freaking slow cause all the websites and were made for better hardware.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, except for the fact that modern Samsung s20 is not really that much more powerful than your s3. Sure it has more RAM, significantly more, but the processor is barely twice as good.
10 years old device has plenty power to run whatever website can offer, apart from maybe some battery degradation. Hell, I have 20 years old laptop that can do that. The reason it doesn't is not technical, it's almost exclusively economical, by which I mean "lazy cheap bastards don't give a flying fuck about the mountains of e-waste we produce"

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is just an ignorant take on things. The S20 has like 4x the core count, and each one of those is at least 2x as energy efficient, and 4x more powerful.

[–] RockyBass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No way the S20 is only slightly more powerful than an S3. If you're not using any CPU intensive apps, such as games, then yeah, you aren't going to see a massive difference. My S7 still runs well enough for browsing, music, and videos, but my S10 will run circles around it if I actually leverage its capabilities.

[–] magikmw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

One of the reasons is security, older Android APIs let your apps do whatever they want. You probably could try to find an apk that would work on older devices, but google has minimal API requirements that involve permissions and data access, and if your app doesn't support them it wont be allowed on the Play Store. So even if devs supported other devices, you wouldn't find the app on the store.

[–] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, look at the facebook app. They had to do "optimizations", because they ran into limits of Android's Dalvik a few years back.

[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More than a few years back - they've long since replaced dalvik with ART.

[–] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or i confused dalvik with art. Don't know anymore. Facebook app got leaner?

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's just been about 10 years since they had that issue. Facebook mitigated it by splitting its services into multiple apps.

[–] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] static_motion@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Tell me about it. Dalvik was replaced by the ART in Android 4.4 Kitkat IIRC, which is what my Nexus 7 shipped with back in 2013. Feels like 3 years ago rather than 10.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably the same team that used to make the Snapchat Android app back in the day

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

What makes it even more ridiculous is that it was originally a perfectly functional 3rd party app that they bought out. AlienBlue worked on ipads. A decade ago.