this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
306 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3447 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Intel doesn’t think that Arm CPUs will make a dent in the laptop market::"They've been relegated to pretty insignificant roles in the PC business."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ARM just makes sense for portable devices for obvious reasons, x86 isn't dying though. For the average person who needs a laptop to do some professional-managerial work ARM is perfect.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are those reasons that you think are so obvious? I have no idea what you could be referring to 😅

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ARM is more efficient and as a "system on chip" reduces the need for as many other components on the boards, phones for example. Unless you're doing heavy cpu or gpu intensive tasks there's a bunch of upsides and no downsides to ARM.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's my impression as well. I'm confused about the “just”. There's many non-portable devices that don't have too heavy workloads and that I'd think would benefit from better energy efficiency.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah the article is about the laptop market, but of course all sort of non-portable devices run on non-x86 platform. I'd even say x86 is the minority unless you reduce it to just desktop workstations.

[–] neeshie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Arm tends to be a lot more power efficient, so you can get better battery life on portable devices.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

And lower power consumption and heat production on all devices, so I don't get the “just”

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Not only that but also reducing the number of chips that need to be powered helps with efficiency.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is also a sizable market for laptops that do not do much more than log onto a remote desktop. Especially with remote working, that has becomes the perfect middle ground between security, cost, and ease of use. A cheap ARM processor would work perfectly for those machines.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm a sysadmin and would much rather have a light arm machine to remote in from than a standard Intel laptop.