this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
484 points (83.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

29707 readers
1908 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Exclusive rights and monopolies are not the same thing. Monopolies are about access to a category of things or services that fulfill a need, not one specific thing. E.g. Samsung has exclusive rights to sell Samsung TVs, but they don't have a monopoly on TVs, and talking about a monopoly on Samsung TVs specifically makes no sense. Similarly no one has a monopoly on landscape drawings, rock music or scifi movies, just exclusive rights to specific pieces of art or literature that they created.

As a side note, patents are a different story imo. Because overly broad patents can actually give you exclusive access to an entire category, and therefore a real monopoly. But you can't patent art.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

your Samsung example is trademark. it's not copyright.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because the example is not about copyright in particular but monopoly vs exclusive access. I wanted one that's not about art to illustrate the point, and the priciple is the same in this regard.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

trademark has nothing to do with copyright. they're two sets of laws that developed a two different times for two different reasons.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So, what does that have to do with the exclusive rights vs monopoly discussion? Both give you exclusive rights, doesn't matter that they come from two different sets of laws.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

trademark is a consumer protection. copyright is a fucking monopoly.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

do you know how I know that you aren't a copyright lawyer?