this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
80 points (98.8% liked)

Fediverse

12 readers
3 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

There’s been a lot of speculation around what Threads will be and what it means for Mastodon. We’ve put together some of the most common questions and our responses based on what was launched today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not aware that Eugen ever said that he wouldn't deal with Meta. Maybe he did, but I'm not aware of it.

The pushback on Mastodon hasn't been by Mastodon gGmbH. It's been by smaller instance admins.

[–] nostalgicgamerz@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I made a mistake, it was Fosstodon.

https://hub.fosstodon.org/assets/images/meeting-with-meta-email.webp

Which means that they probably proposed the same offer to Mastodon and they likely accepted.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

That’s a really hot take. It could be that Eugene - exactly as he says, thinks wide adoption of ActivityPub is a hood thing and that federation is robust enough to handle any potential threat from Threads - which isn’t even federating yet.

Why jump straight to ‘the guy is clearly corrupt and has taken money from Meta’?