I wasn't pointing to a conspiracy, merely the fact that the criticism voiced so far doesn't have any substance to it other than 'I don't like it' and therefore is likely because it's new and different.

Edit:

I just realised you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as 'art' with artists making a case they've been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

Those are two different topics.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

doesn't have any substance to it other than 'I don't like it' and therefore is likely because it's new and different.

So, just being against progress. Like I said.

you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as 'art' with artists making a case they've been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

Lol no.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

against progress

Who? Artists, generally or those upset that AI/LLMs have been taught from their work? Not what I'm implying at all, as already highlighted extensively.

People criticising AI/LLM art as 'not art/not creative'? Yes.

If you're not conflating my argument, then you are either being really fucking stupid or deliberately trolling. In either case, I'm done wasting my time on you.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

Don't try and split hairs now, when you didn't originally.