this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
234 points (94.0% liked)

Games

32579 readers
1730 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So it might actually be worse than KSP2 then. I was so disappointed by that.

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not going to be worse than KSP2. KSP2 launched with game breaking bugs and all of the new features missing (and some of the old ones) as well as bad performance on ALL graphic settings no matter the specs. CS2 has features that differ it from the first game and the performance issues (allegedly) can be fixed by turning settings down (unlike KSP2). Both games launched (or will launch) without modding support which is really bad for both games.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I meant specifically the frame rate, not necessarily the game as a whole. I should have been more specific. I do agree with the points on KSP2 though

[–] ours@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Bad time for beloved indie sims getting sequels.

[–] Bread@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

KSP2 still makes me sad. I still have the hope they can pull a no man's sky. The dream of KSP2 is all I ever wanted out of a space game.