Asklemmy

43892 readers

867 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

in your opinion, what is the biggest downside of Flatpaks? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jackpot@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

            
              needless sandobxing (by default flatpaks can access your filesystem but not mounted folders, how is that secure and not jist inconvenient?)
yet another application manager not even well integrated into operating systems (linux mint doesn't update flatpaks by default)
applications are usually not updated very often, not sure if that's a systemic problem or just laziness
application X that is 50MB stabdalone requires 2GB to install and takes 3GB of space because it requires the entirety of gnome libraries. Application Y also requires 3GB because they use KDE or another version of gnome

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Application Z requires another 3GB because it needs Gnome runtime version X+1, not version X. Although I do believe Flatpak does some kind of reduplication so actual used space is somewhat less.

It's also less of a problem if you flatpak all the apps vs having just a handful. The more apps the better chance they're actually sharing runtimes.

Flatpak updates are handled very smoothly by KDE Discover, I always assumed Gnome Software did the same, so no additional package manager required.

Despite the few downsides Flatpak is still wonderful. As a Kubuntu user it's nice to say Farewell random PPAs whenever there's a need for an actual newish version of an application

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

On a space limited , non upgradeable device (128GB ssd, half of that considering a dual boot) I find it literally unusable. At least with PPAs and AppImage i save 90% of redundant space

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

wjays a mountded folder

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was a interesting set of typos

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

theyre not typos, that wad jnyneitjonal

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If you mount an external partition on a directory (under /mnt for example) by default Flatpaks cannot access it because they are sandboxed