this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
-21 points (20.0% liked)

World News

32317 readers
895 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you give examples of the article's problems?

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not going to go through it all again, but statements such as

"In the absence of official scrutiny of Washington’s spending spree on Ukraine"

Are just not true. Unless, of course, congressional approval does not count as official scrutiny?

"While innocuous on the surface, Power’s comments revealed a great deception the US government is currently waging against the American public."

Thise statement is purely inflammatory and riling up everything.

Furthermore, they're spending multiple paragraphs talking about how much money is being spent and how bad it is without actually saying anything, those are just filler paragraphs intended to further rile up uncritical readers.

And then quite a few of the examples are just stupid and their criticism ignores how those things actually work, and they completely ignore that it is a war and that you cannot publicize everything due to security concerns. Also calling this a proxy war is just LOL.