this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)

Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5668 readers
17 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No match thread, so made this for discussion

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty dull game this, especially since the Young red card. Both bookings were correct though IMO.

I also think, despite the attempts of the commentators (and Dyche) to curry controversy, that Konate's foul there was not enough for a yellow card. If there hadn't already been a red card and if Konate hadn't already been booked, nobody would have been saying the later one was a yellow.

Also, Ally McCoist continues to be a dreadful co-commentator.

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it should've been a second yellow, based on the cynicism of that foul. He knew else he was doing.

Also, Liverpool should've had two penalties. Not sure why the first one wasn't given.

[–] TanakaAsuka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah very confused about that first one as it was clearly a foul, he completely takes Diaz out and doesn't get near the ball. If Diaz isn't fouled he is completely free on goal (albeit at a not great angle)

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The Patterson challenge? Looks a pen at first but on replays there's no real egregious contact.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's definitely a yellow based on the yellow that Tark received, they're almost identical