this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
131 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Has this ever happened before? This is insane lmao.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreatWhiteNope@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As if either of them would agree to a debate

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stupid question, but is it mandatory to have a presidential debate?

[–] axont@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Nope, but there's a non-profit, the Commission on Presidential Debates that gets funding when they happen. The debates are like the two parties having a smooch with various media agencies. It's all theater to shuffle money around, there's nothing in the constitution that says debates need to happen.

There's also nothing in the constitution that says people directly vote for president. Senate is allowed to choose someone random if no one gets 50% of the electoral votes.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Back in the day the League of Women Voters put on the debates and if you wanted any credibility you had to show up. Then the parties were like "Wait, why are we letting an independent group write the questions? This isn't af ucking democracy!" and took control of the debates. Now it seems like htey're just doing away with the pretense all together.