cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ninja/post/52363
I’ve seen Doom run on calculators, an Apple Watch, hell I think some guys at MIT got it running on an abacus. There is an old meme about, “but will it run Crysis?” Turns out the Steam deck WILL run Crysis.
But not Doom (1993). Because that’s just too much to ask.
EDIT: Before you respond to this post, please read the part where I claimed Doom was run on an abacus.
This is OBVIOUSLY humor regarding the rating system Steam uses to decide if games work on the SteamDeck.
This is not a TECHNICAL indictment in any way. Stop explaining what supported and unsupported means.
Your response while right won’t be correct.
The context of your post is that Doom will run on anything, but it won't run on Steam Deck.
If I take everything you say out of context then well...
Crisis (2007) is famously unoptimized and will indeed run on Steam Deck (on high settings too) if you use a fan made launcher.
So your example of a game that runs on Steam Deck is an unsupported game. That won't run after a fresh install.
The difference between Crysis and the remaster is that the remaster is actually optimized and you can probably get it running on a lower end PC, while the OG Crysis can run as a slide show on some modern systems because it's so unoptimized. When people say "But can it run Crysis?" they aren't talking about the remaster.
The Steam Deck compatibility on store pages is not a comprehensive list of games that will run on Steam Deck and that's lame, but that's not what you posted about
Wrong.
My first sentence includes a joke. “…Doom running on an abacus.” My second sentence includes a meme used as a joke, “…but does it run Crysis?” I have set the stage for what I wrote to be interpreted as humor, a joke, funny.
I then provide a comparison, it’ll run Crysis but not Doom (1993)… looks here’s the evidence.
Ha ha… funny.
Now, this conversation is over, you’r wrong, and you have proven you’re an ass.
We’re done here. Learn from your mistake.
Learn to read in context.