Selfhosted

40173 readers

648 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

I'm using compose wrong and I know it. (lemmy.one)

submitted 1 year ago by BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For the last two years, I've been treating compose files as individual runners for individual programs.

Then I brainstormed the concept of having one singular docker-compose file that writes out every single running container on my system... (that can use compose), each install starts at the same root directory and volumes branch out from there.

Then I find out, this is how most people use compose. One compose file, with volumes and directories branching out from wherever ./ is called.

THEN I FIND OUT... that most people that discover this move their installations to podman because compose works on different versions per app and calling those versions breaks the concept of having one singular docker-compose.yml file and podman doesn't need a version for compose files.

Is there some meta for the best way to handle these apps collectively?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just forget about podman-compose and use simple Quadlet container files with Systemd. That way it is not all in the same file, but Systemd handles all the inter-relations between the containers just fine.

Alternatively Podman also supports kubernetes configuration files, which is probably closer to what you have in mind, but I never tried that myself as the above is much simpler and better integrated with existing Systemd service files.

[–] vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quadlet

Requires podman 4.4 though

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, from that version on, it is integrated in Podman, but it was available for earlier versions as a 3rd party extension as well.

But if you are not yet on Podman 4.4 or later you should really upgrade soon, that version is quite old already.

[–] vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

you should really upgrade soon

Debian stable has podman 4.3 and 4.4 is not in stable-backports