this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
654 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
3761 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
654
YouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end “$600 less than cable” ads (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

YouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end “$600 less than cable” ads::Google to "modify or cease" ads after industry review board rejects appeal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 01011@monero.town 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I had no idea YouTube TV costs that much, or that there were people paying that much.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah my parents pay for it because their only other option was Comcast and it was the lesser of two evils. They were paying like $250+ for phone, TV, and gig internet. The TV was like $125 or so, 300+ channels and about 250 of them were useless. At least with YouTube TV the channel listing is concise and the picture quality is good.