Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments
I'm both; they're not mutually exclusive. Get your bearings right.
Honestly, I find the rest of your statements whimsical and unspecific, so I'm not going to respond to them individually. I will say that while my post was meant to convey the wish that modern society and culture not cater to these false beliefs in the ways we do today, I am staunchly of the belief that you cannot legislate culture and that attempts to do so always result in unjust authoritarianism; so, I would never advocate for laws that prohibit religious belief or the personal expression thereof (with certain limits based on context, of course) and would vote against them if they were proposed and I was in a position to oppose them. But I do find the fact that I'm expected to nod and smile when someone professes a patently false belief both nonsensical and detrimental to society as a whole. This opinion is unpopular by virtue of the fact that most people today disagree and think we shouldn't correct people when they profess these kinds of falsehoods. As other atheists have pointed out, we don't afford this luxury to flat earthers or people who believe Elvis is still alive. I simply think that's as it should be and religious beliefs shouldn't have this cultural privilege of being protected from casual criticism.
Cumulative. You need to be an atheist in order to advance into being an anti-theist.
Your examples with Elvis and flat earthers are poor.
It is possible to clearly demonstrate how and why the flat earth theory falls flat; it's proposers are intellectualy dishonest individuals that won't even accept their own findings that disprove their theory.
Regarding Elvis... where is the harm in that? At some point, just by the simple accumulation of time, the belief will die out. The King was a mere human and humans are finite.
The same can not be said about religions, where its crux resides outside the realm of what can be proved or disproved by scientific endeavor. It is not possible to disprove the existence of a supernatural entity; what can be attacked are tenets and demonstrated as obsolete or invalid.
I have nothing against your position but find it banal at this point. It is not new, it is not something previously unconsidered and offers no real solutions just like its counterpart.
My lack of belief stems from a long process of self analysis, through which I systematically removed from my worldview belief. I feel no need to demand from others the same, even if they are educated, as you state in your post.
Belief and the lack thereof must be personal and private affairs.