this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
277 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
277
Disney’s Loki faces backlash over reported use of generative AI / A Loki season 2 poster has been linked to a stock image on Shutterstock that seemingly breaks the platform’s licensing rules regard... (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Disney’s Loki faces backlash over reported use of generative AI / A Loki season 2 poster has been linked to a stock image on Shutterstock that seemingly breaks the platform’s licensing rules regard...::A promotional poster for the second season of Loki on Disney Plus has sparked controversy amongst professional designers following claims that it was created using generative AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, so then why are people targeting the show instead of Shutterstock?

Even then, being mad at Shutterstock doesn't make sense because the person who started selling something AI generated on a platform that doesn't allow it obviously wouldn't disclose that fact.

And you can't just ban anything you think might be AI generated immediately, because then you just become the fuckwit mods of r/art.

[–] Wilibus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will reiterate my point. This outrage is not rooted in some deep seeded hatred towards AI, it is because Disney claimed they didn't want it used on their streaming platform and then immediately used it to market one of their flagship products.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 2 points 1 year ago

And I will reiterate my point: The outrage still doesn't make sense to anyone with any understanding of the facts. If the image is AI generated, it was still purchased most-likely unknowingly from a service that is not supposed to host such content at all.