It definitely seems like a perspective that you have to be able to step back and be like "neither side is justified in their behavior" which is hard for people with a horse in the race to do.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s understandable too, how do you convince someone to stop fighting back so their enemy will stop punching them?

Like, remember when your parents told you that the best way to stop arguing with someone was to just stop arguing?

This is the same situation but instead of just arguing they’re literally committing war crimes and terrorist acts against each other.

Hard to say who started it in the moment when both are acting, and when everyone is acting in it frankly the who started it becomes irrelevant when there is only one good solution, for everyone to stop.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

how do you convince someone to stop fighting back so their enemy will stop punching them?

Heck, part of it is you have to convince people to stop treating others as a monolith. Even the language of "their enemy will stop punching them" implies the entire populace of Israel is one monolith united in oppressing the Palestinians and that the entire population of Palestine is one monolith united in actively fighting Israel.

People need to be able to take a step back and recognize that their enemies are not the common folk, the innocent civilians. Most people just want to live their lives. Only a small minority is ever actually actively engaged in the fighting, or the political decisions to continue fighting.

Israelis (at least those that support Netanyahu and the apartheid state) need to collectively realize that having an apartheid state is not "fighting back"; it's just punishing 99% innocents. Likewise, Hamas needs to realize that mass murdering civilians is not "fighting back"; it's just punishing 99% innocents. True fighting back requires actually finding the people responsible for harming you, not ascribing blame to rando civilians just because they happen to have been born on the same side of the border as your true enemies.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

...and you're treated as culturally insensitive if you point out that it's partially motivated because of two bullshit ass religions, and the reason they won't stop is because they've each just got to prove their God has the bigger dick, even though they're technically the same God.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

When two children are arguing an adult steps in and separates them each into their own timeout corner.

That's what needs to be done, but good fucking luck with that.