this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
397 points (73.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9827 readers
899 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Your situation doesn't reflect the majority's situation, that's what people need to understand, with better public transport it's a very small minority that needs a car.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do understand that. But this meme doesn't understand me.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a way it does, if cars didn't exist you would have found work closer to home and your environmental impact would be lower. Your situation exist because cars allow it to.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's a bad way to phrase it because it frames cars as technological innovation providing a benefit.

The reality, and the best way to phrase it, is different: his situation exists because massive government subsidies for car infrastructure allows it to. He's not an enjoyer of modern convenience; he's a welfare queen.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Thank god it's not like that because I have a great job and a great life that was enabled by the freedom that my cars have given me. Y'all can get rid of your cars but I will always have one regardless of the law or society's opinion. I'd build my own fucking car if you couldn't buy one even.

[–] sky@codesink.io 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good thing memes don't have to account for every individuals experience in the world huh

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The meme makes a blanket statement forgetting about a big swath of rural people, falsely claiming that EVs don't address climate change when the cold fact is that EVs do represent a way for people like me to contribute to the solution. A meme like this deserves a reminder like mine.

[–] sky@codesink.io 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or you could simply remember that it's just a meme and stop getting so worked up!

Signed, A rural EV owner

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Or, I could make a small post so that one of our rural neighbours, driving an SUV, doesn't read "EVs don't solve climate change" and think to themselves "Hey, that's true, may as well continue on with my SUV".

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Your situation doesn’t reflect the majority’s situation

In America this is an extremely common situation. Public transit is abysmal here. We need to build that up before we start removing car infrastructure.