this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
1045 points (97.4% liked)

Antiwork

8379 readers
2 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
yogthos@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
1045
I wonder how long it will take (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Would you be happier with SpaceNoodle saying they leased their body, given they committed to a set time period that their body could be used for their employer’s (lessor’s) purposes?

I would make the following recommendations, ordered as beginning with the most important:

  1. Avoid referring to sex work by selling one's body.
  2. Avoid referring to sex work by leasing one's body, or any similar variation of the same theme.
  3. Avoid referring to any work by any phrasal variation already proscribed for the case of sex work particularly.

To put it simply, just avoid the whole concept.

selling does suggest handing over property on a more permanent basis.

Selling is surrendering ownership through an exchange, usually exchange for currency.

Arguably labour is intrinsically linked to the body providing the labour

The statement is vacuous, almost entirely affirmed merely by the meanings of the terms, and lacking any substantive contribution.

Consider, for comparison, the following proposition:

Arguably air travel is intrinsically linked to the aircraft providing transport.