this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
346 points (96.5% liked)

Android

27941 readers
147 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pantherina@feddit.de 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Poorly yes. Even though

  • no headphone jack
  • super expensive
  • damn huge
  • no SD card slot
  • no hardware switches
  • repairable? Idk
[โ€“] oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • yeah no headphone jack is a bummer
  • a used pixel is cheaper than than
  • my pixel 5 seems pretty small, but idk what they are now or what that is so you're probably right
  • even bigger bummer than no headphone jack imo
  • I don't think those are that important, a piece of tape over the camera is fine imo
  • you're probably right there too, I wish fairphone could run grapheneos ๐Ÿ˜ž
[โ€“] Pantherina@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fairphones have no secure element. The devs may be annoying, but what they dont do for a second is waste time.

Hmm, camera maybe but tape? Also microphone is not that easy. GPS, phone antennas and internet antennas are also way shadier

[โ€“] limerod@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fairphone uses the latest snapdragon. Unless qualcomm messed up, their processors do support and have supported secure element for a while. What you probably meant was a dedicated secure element chip. That's present on tensor but not on most other smartphones.

[โ€“] renohren@partizle.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fairphone uses Qualcomm snapdragon chips but they don't use chips made for mobile phones, it's chips for industrial use they buy, so the secure element might be missing. The reason is: they are supported for way longer which allows fairphone such long update periods. The shortlist of other phonemakers who can do the same are the ones who design their own chips: Google, Samsung, Apple.

[โ€“] limerod@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Qualcomm does list this chip for enterprise grade use and updates for multiple years to come on android. The block diagram has a box labelled security. If the chip was as insecure as people claim, it couldn't be used for biometrics much, if at all.

I wasn't meaning to fault the grapheneos devs, like you said it's fairphones fault for not making it possible ๐Ÿ˜ž

[โ€“] krolden@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is a security element wasting time?

[โ€“] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Huh? GrapheneOS is not wasting time with features or supporting phones that are not secure to their standards (meaning basically impossible to hardware-crack, which is NOT everyones requirement)

[โ€“] aprnu@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish fairphone could run grapheneos

They get this request a lot, see this: https://github.com/GrapheneOS/os-issue-tracker/issues/1961

and this.

Yep, my point was shaking my fist at fairphone, not the grapheneos devs

[โ€“] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Add very shitty on-screen-fingerprint reader to that list...

[โ€“] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah I really dont want to upgrade my pixel 5 for a 6 for many reasons but that is a big one

[โ€“] krolden@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pixels are some of the cheapest phones

[โ€“] Pantherina@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not in my experience? A new Pixel 8 costs like 800โ‚ฌ, thats like 600โ‚ฌ more than I would consider appropriate for a phone. All these prices are made up

Pretty sure he meant cheapest used

A p7p used goes for around US$400 here

[โ€“] krolden@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pixel 8 has full support from google until 2030. Know of any current phones going for under 800 bucks with anywhere near that support lifetime?

Also, the pixel 7a is supported until 2026 and is $500. Both prices are quite reasonable for a computing device you're going to carry around for at least the next three years.

[โ€“] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

In this case a Pixel 8 is the only real option poorly. How can a phone just last 3 years from now on? Thats crazy...