this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
144 points (93.4% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Large difference in employment rates between men and women!

If you compare the employment rates in EU regions, you will notice that the female employment rates still lag behind the male rates in most of the regions.

The EU has set a policy target in this area of halving the gender employment gap from 11.7% in 2019 to 5.8% by 2030.

The green regions shown here are those that have already attained the target.

Source: Eurostat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not really sure that we should be inferring much based on the results on this map. It seems reasonable to me to make an argument that locations with a higher degree of religiosity tend to have less women in their workforce. Is that a problem for those people? I don’t know, I’m not them.

My personal beliefs about the workforce have jack-shit to do with what’s going on in highly religious countries.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s not a problem if it’s a choice, but the question becomes whether it really is a choice.

Is it a choice if financial support means it is not possible to be equal without personal sacrifice. Is it a choice if there is societal pressure to conform. Is it a choice if male salaries are higher in general, and then self perpetuating. Is it a choice if there is no access to affordable or free childcare. Is it a choice if the father has no right to take parental leave?

Is it a choice if women are not allowed to drive, like in Saudi Arabia? Is it a choice to wear the burqa or niqab, like in Iran?

We shouldn’t confuse choices made under the guise of religion with personal choices people would make if religion wasn’t imposed in them. Sure, some would choose either way, but a more equitable society is a more free society. Some more religious countries used to have no divorce, so domestic violence persisted. People “chose” to stay with their abuser. When separation and divorce was legal, many chose to leave.

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if we make the assumption that it’s not by choice, who holds the responsibility to do something to correct it?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Well, the EU is asking the countries to try themselves....

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But where do you draw the line on religious acceptance and tolerance?

I think that is the philosophical root of this discussion.