this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
68 points (97.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26903 readers
1803 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In politics most people just critizise each other, but what did your local government actually do a good job on?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why don't you give them your money? Go minimize harm in your local community.

Addicts quit because they hit rock bottom. They get to a point where they cannot sustain their lifestyle. You will be preventing them from ever getting to that point and they will be able to sustain their addiction indefinitely. Until the money runs out and they are more addicted than when they started. Free money never lasts forever.

[–] twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that?

[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I fucking hate when nerds request a source for something that is clearly an opinion or common sense. What are you disputing?

[–] twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Common sense is extremely subjective.

Is it really more effective to not help addicts than to use harm reduction methods?

"Facts over feels" and all that.

[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is a difference between harm reduction and giving addicts free drugs. You know this and are greatly oversimplifying the discussion.

[–] twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Giving addicts free drugs is a subset of harm reduction. Honestly, at this point in the discussion, we need numbers to be productive.

[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the incentive to quit drugs if you are given them for free your entire life?

[–] twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they're not stealing for money, supporting the black market, dying of overdoses, or spreading disease by sharing needles, and have consistent dosages and proximity to support programs, why quit?

Probably the massive social stigma and loss of positive effects due to built tolerance.

It would make the problem way less urgent at any rate.

(https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/opioids/responding-canada-opioid-crisis/safer-supply.html)

[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If they’re not stealing for money, supporting the black market, dying of overdoses, or spreading disease by sharing needles, and have consistent dosages and proximity to support programs, why quit? Probably the massive social stigma and loss of positive effects due to built tolerance.

Yeah sorry I'm not sure social stigma is going to stop addicts from using drugs. agree to disagree I guess.

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"doing heroin is bad actually"

UHHH SOURCE? SOURCE? SOURCE? SOURCE? SOURCE? SOURCE?

[–] TrickedPrivacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’d like to point out that it costs a society much less to supply one with heroin than it does to deal with all the thefts and crime that comes with the user having to fund an illegal black market, not to mention all the stabbings over drug territory.

We need to grow some balls and be adult about this situation, what we’re doing hasn’t worked for the last 50 years.

Misuse of Drugs act has been in place what 50 years now? Consumption rates have increased and so have people getting contaminated drugs/deaths.

Source you may ask? Oh.. only the National Crime Agency on gov.uk

https://nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/nsa-drugs

And we may be nerds but if that means I know what I’m talking about then fuck yeah, beats staying in ones box and regurgitating the statue-quo. - When frontline police say we’re making the problem worse one has to start asking questions.