this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
38 points (80.6% liked)

Ask Science

8653 readers
2 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems like it should and the result should be one. Does mathematics agree with me on that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] giacomo@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many nothings are in nothing? I guess one nothing.

[โ€“] Bizarroland@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mathematically, zero is nothing.

You can't have one of nothing.

There's no such thing as a single nothing. All of the nothings are all the same nothing, there are infinite amounts of nothing but no nothing at all.

Of course there is a limit to nothing because there is something, in a more real and universal sense, but mathematically speaking there is no nothing.

So whenever you divide or multiply anything by nothing all that you get is nothing. If you multiply nothing by itself you end up with nothing. If you divide nothing by itself you get nothing.

When I was a kid I got really fascinated with Zen Koans.

Koans being the kind of self-evident riddles that are most famously popularized by the question, "if a tree falls in the woods, and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"

And ultimately I ended up creating my own Zen Koans, almost by accident.

That Koan being, "What does nothing look like?"

I did everything in my power to visualize what nothing would look like. I imagined infinite black spaces with nothing around and nothing in it, a void of eternal darkness.

I tried and I tried and I tried but I couldn't help but feel like I had failed to understand.

Then one day I was standing on a hill the wind was blowing through my hair the Sun was shining on me, it was spring outside in the birds were singing and I was trying to visualize what nothingness would look like when I realized the reason why I couldn't visualize nothingness.

I couldn't visualize nothingness because I was looking at it.

If there was nothingness I wouldn't be there to see it.