Linux

48224 readers

901 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

X11 vs Wayland (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by packetloss@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm a seasoned Linux user, but mostly for servers and services, not really for desktop use.

I've dabbled in some desktop distros on my personal rig a few times in the past, but ultimately due to specific games, I've gone back to Windows.

I recently installed Arch and KDE. Upon initial boot I noticed it was defaulted to Wayland. Every time I would try to log in it would just go to a black screen then cycle back to the login screen. Picking X11 would bring me to the desktop.

Basic Specs:

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 3D
nVidia RTX 4090

I have been doing some reading into this and it looks like the issue is due to the proprietary nVidia drivers, but there are solutions to work around this.

I know nothing of Wayland other than its supposed to be more secure. My question is, is it worth the time/effort to get Wayland working? I primarily use my system for gaming. X11 seems to be working just fine for me right now.

Forgive me if I'm using some of the terminology wrong, still learning.

EDIT - Selling my gpu is not an option. I knew ahead of time that AMD has superior Linux support, but the 4090's performance can't be matched by anything AMD has. Maybe next upgrade I'll go back to AMD if they have the top performer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still no issues on Debian.

[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I imagine you're talking about stability issues and not the numerous security flaws with X11 that are baked in to the protocol. Wayland is an improvement for many reasons, not just stability and the fact that it is actively developed unlike X11.

Some reading:

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I've followed this stuff for years and years. I've been using Linux pretty much exclusively for a quarter of a century. People love to harp on the security issues, but from what I've seen that's pretty much theoretical. The only real compelling argument is that developers are leaning toward Wayland, so that's the way it will go. I'm sure some day I'll go to update and it'll be time to make that change.

I'm not a developer. I wasn't super happy with the change to systemd, but it's not like I was the one that had to deal with the init v issues, so when it changed, I went along. I'm sure the same will happen with Wayland. The last time I tried it, a lot of my decades of cruft didn't work, shortcuts and workflow issues. Sure, I should probably clean up all that crap anyway, but like I said, it'll happen when it happens. Until then, I'm completely happy with X11.