this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
140 points (95.5% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5698 readers
1390 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're talking about the list having a person's name censored. They tracked down which article was visited (pretty easy to do, since removing a name from a headline doesn't make the headline hard to search for).
I suspected it was Snowden. I mean, who else has there been for notable US defectors that got prominent news articles?
I doubt it was Snowden. A security expert wouldn't used google as search engine, especially in a way they could pin point it back to him..
Maybe the North Korean defector?
Maybe try reading the comment you just responded to again