this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
463 points (93.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Story Highlights

  • Third time support has exceeded 60%, along with 2017 and 2021
  • Republicans primarily behind the increase, with 58% now in favor
  • Political independents remain group most likely to favor third party
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kobra@lemm.ee 228 points 1 year ago (5 children)

RANKED CHOICE VOTING

make parties irrelevant

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

make parties irrelevant

Precisely why they will never let this happen

[–] dirtbiker509@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, all of us plebs want RCV. But the problem is in order to get it, we need one of two major parties in control to make the change. But they don't want to make the change because they know if they do, us plebs will actually start voting for independent parties and they'll lose their power. :(

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not about voting for a party in RCV. It effectively solves almost all of the US political dysfunction. With RCV...

  • each political party in the mix will actually have to campaign to win elections (no swing states),
  • gerrymandering will be a thing of the past,
  • the electoral college will finally die,
  • the people will get a candidate that more closely matches their desired candidate, and
  • best of all, we wouldn't have to vote between a douche or a turd sandwich.

Honestly, I get erect just thinking about how much better things could be with this system of voting. It's essentially like a unionization for our political system, which is why it will never happen.

Why would the wolves opt to remove themselves from the hen house?

So you gonna just keep complaining online or do something to make them?

[–] Cappurnikus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Pleasantly surprised to see this is the top comment.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I'm personally in favor of STAR, takes how leading candidates fair in head to head matchups against each other without confronting voters with the possible ballot Atlas of a true condorcet vote

[–] centof@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

This is a core policy of the Forward Party along with open primaries and independent redistricting commissions.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Stop Tim (my neighbor from) Voting? I'm for that. Dude is a giant dork and votes explicitly for things he thinks will fuck things up, not things he thinks will improve society. He's a doomsday dude, wants society to go to hell in a handbasket so, per his religion, his god can come and fuck it up more. I mean, believe what you want, just, let's try and make this place better not worse.