this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1651 readers
26 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What a stupid take.
It has nothing to do with their religion, and everything to do with running a for-profit organization under the guise of 'charity'. If the church they donate profits to does charitable works, they are a charity. ~~Sanitarium benefits from tax-free status without actually doing anything to benefit society.~~ Dave's post above shows this isn't correct. They pay no tax because they donate all their profit.
Sanitarium are not a charity. I've explained a bit more in another reply here.
In my view, there is nothing wrong with a church having charitable status. However, this status should be based on their charity, not based on them simply being a church.
Hell, we could apply the marae criteria to churches:
And I'd add a charity should not be allowed to donate to political parties or encourage their members to. A charity should be non-political.
Yeah I was wrong, I've edited my reply.
I agree with your suggestion btw. Charities should do charitable works. Being a church in on in itself a charitable works. We really need to move past religion as the most important thing.