this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
1223 points (98.1% liked)

News

23300 readers
3759 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A journalist and advocate who rose from homelessness and addiction to serve as a spokesperson for Philadelphia’s most vulnerable was shot and killed at his home early Monday, police said.

Josh Kruger, 39, was shot seven times at about 1:30 a.m. and collapsed in the street after seeking help, police said. He was pronounced dead at a hospital a short time later. Police believe the door to his Point Breeze home was unlocked or the shooter knew how to get in, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported. No arrests have been made and no weapons have been recovered, they said.

Authorities haven’t spoken publicly about the circumstances surrounding the killing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halfempty@kbin.social 152 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm always a bit suspicious when a Journalist is killed like this. Who were those who may have been threatened by what he published?

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 122 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The people in these comments talking like this is "just another day in a US city" have no fucking idea what they're talking about. This is not the kind of violence that randomly happens. This person was clearly targeted.

They also fail to grasp the concept of "per capita" crime/murder statistics.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Per capita? Really? Try per capita gun murders around the world and see what countries the US keeps company with. I mean, your argument is basically because there are lots of people, being shot is NBD because the odds are low because there are lots of people?

And yeah, again, compared to other places this is the kind of violence that happens in the US.

However, this was a targeted shooting. A deliberate murder. That does tend to be a more rare occurrence, but it’s dishonest to break it out and treat it separately from the overall use of crime related gun use in the US.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? Way to miss the point entirely. Not only that, but you've completely misrepresented my argument.

First: yes, this was clearly a targeted shooting, so this discussion doesn't really apply to this specific case. However...

I haven't said anything was no big deal, just pointing out basic statistics. Using the concept of "per capita," when discussing phenomena among very large groups of people, is one of the (if not the) only ways to glean any valuable information from the data.

1,000 gun crimes seems like a lot in a town of 23,000 people. 1,000 gun crimes in a city of 2,000,000 people? Not so much... (obviously these numbers were made up to make a point)

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I didn’t miss your point. I understand perfectly what you meant. However, you did miss my pointing out of your use of statistics via per capita as an argument to water down risk against the broader view of the US gun crime rate vs the rest of the world to point out that yes, Indeed, this is a US problem.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I implied anywhere that I thought it wasn't a US problem, that was not my intention at all. Clearly it is.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Per capita rates of gun violence in the United States are almost 90 times higher than the United Kingdom, for instance.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. This is a uniquely American problem. I am agreeing with you.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Actually, I was agreeing with you. I hadn't posted anything prior, so you couldn't have been agreeing or disagreeing with me. I think you confused me for the other person. 😀

[–] jasory@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

"A targeted shooting a deliberate murder.... that does tend to be more rare"

Accidental fatal shootings are well known to exceed intentional ones.

It's rare to get an article on individual targeted killings, but they do in fact comprise the majority of killings. So no, this is not a rare form of killing at all, it's simply being reported because it's another journalist.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] febra@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't surprise me one bit. There's an epidemic of violence going through the conservative movement right now. They've been growing more and more violent. See Jan 6. and all the terrorist attacks/shootings coming from their side lately.

[–] TheCuriosity@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or who would have been threatened by what would have been published, should he still be alive?

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

This is why journalists should invest in a dead man's switch that will automatically publish stuff I the journalists cannot check in

One last fuck you from the grave

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

https://www.inquirer.com/crime/josh-kruger-killed-point-breeze-shooting-philadelphia-journalist-20231002.html

“Either the door was open, or the offender knew how to get the door open,” he said. “We just don’t know yet.”

Detectives believe Kruger’s death may have been the result of a domestic dispute or may have been drug-related, according to three law enforcement sources with knowledge of the case. The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation, said police investigators recovered troubling text messages between Kruger and a former partner. Investigators also recovered methamphetamine inside Kruger’s bedroom, the sources said.

In recent months, he’d written on social media about a variety of alarming incidents at his home.

In April, he posted that an ex-partner had broken into his home. “The door was locked, so he had somehow obtained a copy of my keys,” he wrote. He had allowed the man, whom he’d known for years “before his troubles,” to stay at his house briefly after being released from jail. He said he was able to deescalate the situation and the man eventually left, and he changed his locks.

In August, someone threw a rock through his home window, he said. Then, about two weeks ago, he wrote on Facebook that someone came to his house searching for their boyfriend — “a man I’ve never met once in my entire life.” The person called themselves “Lady Diabla, the She-Devil of the Streets” and threatened him, he wrote.

[–] Nahvi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here.

I have an uncle who was killed due to an article he was doing research for. Sadly, he ended up in a coma and then someone came back to finish the job. It had a large impact on my mother and her siblings, though it was a few years before I was born. I had always wondered how much of it was an exaggeration until a couple years ago when we found an article saying basically the same things the aunts and uncles always had.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it because they interviewed the aunts and uncles as their primary source?

[–] Nahvi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That is a great idea, but no. He was living in another part of the country from them at the time of the initial attack. The article was written in that area.